誇大之推論,看似極度不可能,難保絕對不發生。指摘該種推論為滑坡謬誤,無異於誇大該種推論之不可能,本身亦觸犯滑坡謬誤。 | An exaggerated reasoning seems to be extremely impossible, but no one can guarantee that it will never happen. Criticizing such reasoning as a slippery slope is no more than exaggerating the impossibility of such reasoning, and also falls into a slipper slope. |
是故,滑坡謬誤只可觀察,不可指謫。 | Thus, a slippery slope is observable, not criticizable. |
Chinese: 吳爾軒的後設猜想
English: Narvis the Cloud's Metahypotheses
Japanese: ナルビスのメタ予想
Latin: Narvis Nubes Metahypotheses
English: Narvis the Cloud's Metahypotheses
Japanese: ナルビスのメタ予想
Latin: Narvis Nubes Metahypotheses
本網站內容之使用,請參閱著作權聲明書。
To use the contents on this website, please read Copyright Statement.
2017-03-26
指摘滑坡謬誤本身亦觸犯滑坡謬誤
Criticizing a Slippery Slope Also Falling into a Slippery Slope
訂閱:
張貼留言 (Atom)
沒有留言:
張貼留言