Chinese: 吳爾軒的後設猜想
English: Narvis the Cloud's Metahypotheses
Japanese: ナルビスのメタ予想
Latin: Narvis Nubes Metahypotheses

本網站內容之使用,請參閱著作權聲明書
To use the contents on this website, please read Copyright Statement.

顯示具有 序 The Prefaces 標籤的文章。 顯示所有文章
顯示具有 序 The Prefaces 標籤的文章。 顯示所有文章

2017-12-10

後設猜想是結構主義與解構主義之連續統
The Metahypotheses is a Continuum between Structuralism and Deconstruction



結構主義是對於結構之分解,即化整為零。 Structuralism is the decomposition of the structure, with which a thing is observed as parts rather than a whole.
解構主義是對於結構主義之分解,即化零為整。 Deconstruction is the decomposition of structuralism, with which a thing is observed as a whole rather than parts.
後設猜想總是先解構主義式地為一個現象賦予一個名詞,再結構主義式地為那個名詞賦予一個解釋。 The Metahypotheses always deconstructively gives a noun to a phenomenon at first, and then structurally gives an explanation to that noun.

2017-10-12

後設猜想是狂妄與謙遜之調和
The Metahypotheses is the Mixture of Arrogance and Modesty



「後設」二字,是狂妄地意圖以全知觀點觀察及描述一切現象;而「猜想」二字,則是謙遜地留有以其他觀點觀察及描述一切現象之餘地。故後設猜想,就字面而言,是狂妄與謙遜之調和。 Hence, The Metahypotheses is literally the mixture of arrogance and modesty

2017-10-11

後設猜想之常見情境
A Common Situation in the Metahypotheses



後設猜想喜歡營造出下列情境,就是你屬於要麼情況A、要麼情況B、要麼情況C等,而這些有限列舉的情況涵蓋所有可能性,使得你客觀上不能、主觀上也不想去否認這樣的歸類。 The Metahypotheses likes to declare a situation that you are limited to one of the case A, the case B, the case C, and so on, wherein the countable cases cover all possibilities, so that you objectively cannot and subjectively do not want to deny such classification.
藉此,後設猜想將一個議題定案,然後尋找下一個議題故技重施。 In this way, the Metahypotheses gives a conclusion to an issue, and then it searches for a next issue to play the same trick.

2016-08-30

後設猜想之不平等
The Inequality of the Metahypotheses



平等函數對於系統所固有之命題始有適用之餘地,故不完備之系統即無所謂平等。 The function of equality is effective only to the theses existed in a system, so the equality is inapplicable in an incomplete system.
後設猜想既立基於系統之不完備,自無許平等恆與其共存。 Founded on the incompleteness of a system, the Metahypotheses forbid the equality always exists therewith.

2016-02-04

資本主義黑洞
Capitalistic Black Hole




後設猜想既不討論,也不意圖討論發達資本的點子,或者更直白地,賺錢的門道。 The Metahypotheses do neither discuss nor intent to discuss ideas of developing capital, or more straightforward, ways of making money.
因為事物一旦進入資本主義的循環,就變得十分惱人,並且迅速凋亡。 Because when a thing joins the circulation of Capitalism, it becomes annoying and decays quickly.
如今,資本主義已經過於壯大,事物難逃其魔掌。它不斷將事物捲入其中,推擠、扭曲、壓榨、吸收、耗盡,猶如黑洞。 Now, Capitalism has been too strong for things to escape from it. It keeps drawing things into it, pressing, distort, squeezing, absorbing and exhausting them, as what a black hole does.
甚至,當既有的事物都耗盡後,它會創造新事物,以更新這個絕望的漩渦。 Moreover, when all existing things are exhausted, it will create new things, to refresh this despairing vortex.
因此,我將資本主義稱為:後設煩惱源。 Thus, I call Capitalism: a meta anxiety source.

2015-04-14

何謂後設?
What is "Meta"?



例如:「書」中書,在本書中,復收錄別書,則本書即後設書也。 With regard to a "book" of books, the book in which other books are collected is a metabook.
例如:「劇」中劇,在本劇中,復表演別劇,則本劇即後設劇也。 With regard to a "drama" of dramas, the drama in which other dramas are played is a metadrama.
例如:「夢」中夢,在本夢中,復遊歷別夢,則本夢即後設夢也。 With regard to a "dream" of dreams, the dream in which other dreams are experienced is a metadream.
後設,乃形式之自包絡。 Meta is a form covering itself.
又觀念世界以「世界」之形式包絡實體世界,故凡觀念皆後設,且當然後設猜想。 Moreover, since the conceptual world covers the real world by the form of "world", every concept is of meta, and of course, a metahypothesis.

2015-04-08

學習的目的
The Purpose of Study



學習,終究是為了使甚微小而孤獨者[1]認識蟲魚鳥獸、草木花果之動靜,乃至於山河、海陸、天地、群星、宇宙之過去、現在、未來,以讚嘆其等之美,而在死亡的那一刻,欣喜地與其等合一。 Study is eventually to let the small and solitary one[1] know the dynamic and static states of insects, fishes, birds and beasts, as well as of grasses, trees, flowers and fruits, and furthermore, to let him know the past, the presence and the future of mountains and rivers, seas and lands, heaven and earth, stars and universe, to admire the beauty thereof, and to joyfully merge thereinto at the moment of death.



Notes:

[1] 即自我。 That is, self.

2014-09-12

透過後設猜想之唯一救贖
The Only Salvation through the Metahypotheses



凡內省覺察自身之與世界處於對立,剎現自身之飄渺於虛空中舉足徬徨者,獨因瞻仰後設層疊之巍峨,確信真理之真理均為猜想,更藉若干詮釋分割並重組世界,使各信念受包絡而相容,俾拾回佇立[1]之憑依。 Everyone who through an introspection becomes aware of the alienation between himself and the world, hence suddenly realizes that he is rootless and helpless in the void, may only due to a look-up to the marvel of the metalayers strongly believes that, true is that, all truths are hypotheses, therefore by interpretations divides and reassembles the world, in order to envelop every faith and make them consistent, on purpose to find back the reliance to stand[1].



Notes:

[1] 即持存。 It means to persist.

2014-08-08

意志梯度
The Gradient of the Will



我在〈猜想之方針〉所謂「指引出人的方向」,方法如次:

The method "to point out a human direction," what I have said in A Direction of the Metahypotheses, is as follows:
使主體透過後設基準進行觀察時,發現一切人之活動均處於哥德爾界限之開區間所框設之螺旋辯證舞台,而使上開主體自身意志在存續期間內之任何時空均具有梯度,若且唯若,使上開主體基於上開觀察所得之回饋將自身意志重建為連續函數。 Let a subject, observing through the Metastandard, to discover that, all human activities are on the spirally dialectical stage installed within the open interval over Godel's boundary, thus let the will of the subject to be always with a gradient in any space-time it survives, if and only if, let the subject, basing on the feedback received from the observation, to reconstructs his will to a continuous function.

2014-03-01

猜想之方針
A Direction of the Metahypotheses



敝人不肯冗述,別人也無暇細讀,茲參閱古今中外的先人足跡,乘興隨寫若干小品,試圖指引出人的方向。 I have no will to make a harangue, and others have no time to deliberate about it as well, so I just casually write a few essays, with references to the footprints of the eastern and western pioneers, trying to point out a human direction.
各篇文章均有中英對照,且兩者間有著微妙的差異,互相彌補語言天生的不足。 Each essay is done by Chinese and English, and between the translations are some interesting differences, in order to support each other, in view of the innativ limitation of languages.

2014-02-26

科學革命宣言
Scientific Revolution Declaration



科學家應捨棄一己之私集思廣益開發一套人工智慧,網羅不確定命題而以遞迴更新方式無限逼近完備公理系統,並應透過學閥、財閥、軍閥等力量勸誘全國人民締結社會契約同意以上開人工智慧為判斷一切權利義務關係之唯一準據,俾利理想國之生成。 All scientists shall unselfishly implement by synectics an artificial intelligence, for collecting undecidable theses and infinitely approaching a complete axiom system by recursive updates, and shall persuade people through the dominative forces in academy, in commerce, in military, or in other fields, in order to conclude a social contract in which the artificial intelligence becomes the only criterion to measure all relationships between rights and obligations, on purpose to found the Republic.