勞動動物 Animal Laborans

漢娜‧鄂蘭於《人之條件》最末節所稱「勞動動物」，與書名所稱「人」有別[1]，固無疑義。	The term "animal laborans" Hannah Arendt used in the last section of The Human Condition shall be distinguished from the term "human" she used in the title of the book[1].
現實之中，人之所以為人之活動，苟隨勞動動物之所欲，無不降格，乃人之條件，付之烏有。	In our experience in the reality, the activities showing human values are always degraded as participated by animal laborans. In this way, no human condition can be retained.
是勞動動物對於該等活動，不得作為主體；已誤為主體而為行為者，宣告其行為無效。	Thus, animal laborans is not allowed to participate in such activities. An action mistakenly conducted by animal laborans shall be declared legally invalid.

---

Notes:

[1]

勞動動物與人有別云者，非謂兩者不可同屬單一個體。

The sentence "animal laborans shall be distinguished from human" does not mean the two cannot be in an individual.

〈三世因果論〉之寬慰 The Consolation from the Theory of Three Period of Life

現世之因果奇異點有害於理性之完全，爰引進〈三世因果論〉，以基於〈相對性原理〉為時空之外延，使因果奇異點屬於其中之平滑因果函數，俾假一致之理性以寬慰。

A causal singularity in the present life is detrimental to the completeness of rationality, so there introduces the Theory of Three Period of Life to create an extension of the spacetime, based on the Principle of Relativity, such that the causal singularity belongs to a smooth causal function therein, so as to console people's heart according to the consistent rationality.

資訊封包 Information Envelope

集合縱含有實在，仍非實在。	A set, even if it contains a substance, is still not a substance.
資訊封包既集合後設層疊之映射，其後設資格者不存在時，即失附麗以致消滅。	An information envelope, being a set of mappings of metalayers, when losing its metaqualifier, loses it dependency, resulting in its vanishment.
資訊封包，係以罹於不存在後設資格者之資訊量作為閥值而定義之。	An information envelope is defined by a threshold, which is the amount of information critical for a metaqualifier to exist for it.
集合，其資訊量未減至上開閥值，或已逾之者，不認為資訊封包。	A set before its amount of information decreases to or after that increases beyond said threshold, is not deemed an information envelope.

意志之不確定性 The Uncertainty of Will

意志已生之〈世界上存在性〉恆不生確定力。	The existed worldly existence of a will never results in a prejudicial effect.
已生世界上存在性之意志因表示不完全或一部不相容於世界致其結果不確定於世界。	Even if a will is of a world existence, if it is expressed incompletely to or partially inconsistently with the world, the result thereof remains uncertain to the world.
表示完全不相容於世界者，與未表示於世界者同。	An expression completely inconsistent with the world is deemed no expression to the world.

形式即實質 Form is Exactly Substance

形式不憑實質，輒無存在之必要，故如以形式重於實質，不免於空泛。	A form is unnecessary to exist without a substance, so the formalism is null.
實質不依形式，輒無定義之可能，故如以實質重於形式，不免於浮動。	A substance is impossible to be defined without a form, so the substantivism is void.
是以形式若且唯若實質，乃當然之解釋。	Thus, the form exists if and only if the substance exists, as a matter of course.
又為邏輯之自洽，其等皆為時變函數，亦當然之結果。	Moreover, for the purpose of logic consistence, they shall be time-variant functions, as a matter of course, either.

資本主義痛苦之簡單量化思考 A Simply Quantitative Thinking for Capitalistic Suffering

所謂的資本，不是指資金，而是指生產工具。	The term "capital", does not mean fund, but instrument of production.
生產工具的益處，就是節省勞力。	Instruments of production provide merit of labor-saving.
如果一個人沒有任何生產工具，他就必須辛苦地採集、捕獵才能生存。	If a person does not own any instrument of production, he must survives hard by collecting and hunting.
如果一個人有了農地，他只需要播種，等待收成，就能輕鬆生存。當然，他可以耕耘，取得豐收。	If a person owns a piece of farmland, he just sows, and waits for harvest, then he easily survives. Of course, he may till to get a bumper harvest.
如果一個人有了耕耘機，他連耕耘的勞力也節省了，卻同樣取得豐收。	If a person owns a tiller, he still gets a bumper harvest, while he saves his labor of tilling.
此處，農地、耕耘機，就是典型的資本。	Here, the farmland and the tiller are classical instruments of production.
節省勞力，就是人類進步的所在。	Labor-saving is regarded as a kind of human progress.
可是，這在資本主義下，只是假象。	However, this is an illusion in Capitalism.
顯然，農地、耕耘機等生產工具，不是天上掉下來的禮物，而是透過「等價交易」取得的。	Obviously, instruments of production such as the farmland and the tiller are not gifts from the heaven. We get them by "equivalent trading".
在這樁交易中，生產工具的價值，恰好等於它所節省的勞力。	In such a trade, the value of the instrument of production is exactly equal to the labor it saves.
為了日後節省勞力，而事先墊付勞力，結果根本沒有節省勞力。人類毫無進步，反而繞了遠路。	In order to save labor in future, we pay our labor in advance. In summary, there is no labor-saving. Human makes no progress, but a detour.
只要處在資本主義的等價交易的制度下，這個結果就不會改變。	Under Capitalism's equivalent trading system, we cannot change the result.
所以馬克思才認為必須透過「暴力革命」，搶奪資本家的生產工具，交由全民共享。	This is why Marx considered "violent revolution" to plunder the capitals from the capitalists to the community.
這就是共產主義的起源。	And this is the origin of communism.

資本主義黑洞 Capitalistic Black Hole

後設猜想既不討論，也不意圖討論發達資本的點子，或者更直白地，賺錢的門道。	The Metahypotheses do neither discuss nor intent to discuss ideas of developing capital, or more straightforward, ways of making money.
因為事物一旦進入資本主義的循環，就變得十分惱人，並且迅速凋亡。	Because when a thing joins the circulation of Capitalism, it becomes annoying and decays quickly.
如今，資本主義已經過於壯大，事物難逃其魔掌。它不斷將事物捲入其中，推擠、扭曲、壓榨、吸收、耗盡，猶如黑洞。	Now, Capitalism has been too strong for things to escape from it. It keeps drawing things into it, pressing, distort, squeezing, absorbing and exhausting them, as what a black hole does.
甚至，當既有的事物都耗盡後，它會創造新事物，以更新這個絕望的漩渦。	Moreover, when all existing things are exhausted, it will create new things, to refresh this despairing vortex.
因此，我將資本主義稱為：後設煩惱源。	Thus, I call Capitalism: a meta anxiety source.