勞動動物 Animal Laborans

漢娜‧鄂蘭於《人之條件》最末節所稱「勞動動物」，與書名所稱「人」有別[1]，固無疑義。	The term "animal laborans" Hannah Arendt used in the last section of The Human Condition shall be distinguished from the term "human" she used in the title of the book[1].
現實之中，人之所以為人之活動，苟隨勞動動物之所欲，無不降格，乃人之條件，付之烏有。	In our experience in the reality, the activities showing human values are always degraded as participated by animal laborans. In this way, no human condition can be retained.
是勞動動物對於該等活動，不得作為主體；已誤為主體而為行為者，宣告其行為無效。	Thus, animal laborans is not allowed to participate in such activities. An action mistakenly conducted by animal laborans shall be declared legally invalid.

---

Notes:

[1]

勞動動物與人有別云者，非謂兩者不可同屬單一個體。

The sentence "animal laborans shall be distinguished from human" does not mean the two cannot be in an individual.