邏輯上,反歧視不許歧視者行歧視,致扭曲其本性,自亦不失為歧視,故反歧視不過以更強之歧視凌駕於上而已。 | Anti-discrimination forbids a discriminator to conduct discrimination. However, logically, in view of distorting the nature the discriminator, anti-discrimination itself is also a kind of discrimination. In such aspect, anti-discrimination is just placing a kind of stronger discrimination over other discrimination. |
可見消除歧視,必須自發,如強求他人,則歧視不滅。 | Therefore, discrimination can only be eliminated spontaneously, and cannot be eliminated by compulsion. |
又,反歧視之邏輯上不可能,與反歧視之現實上必要性,誠屬二事。 | It is noted that, the logical impossibility of anti-discrimination does not deny the realistic necessity of anti-discrimination. |
Chinese: 吳爾軒的後設猜想
English: Narvis the Cloud's Metahypotheses
Japanese: ナルビスのメタ予想
Latin: Narvis Nubes Metahypotheses
English: Narvis the Cloud's Metahypotheses
Japanese: ナルビスのメタ予想
Latin: Narvis Nubes Metahypotheses
本網站內容之使用,請參閱著作權聲明書。
To use the contents on this website, please read Copyright Statement.
2016-11-09
反歧視之邏輯上不可能
The Logical Impossibility of Anti-Discrimination
訂閱:
張貼留言 (Atom)
沒有留言:
張貼留言