Chinese: 吳爾軒的後設猜想
English: Narvis the Cloud's Metahypotheses
Japanese: ナルビスのメタ予想
Latin: Narvis Nubes Metahypotheses

本網站內容之使用,請參閱著作權聲明書
To use the contents on this website, please read Copyright Statement.

2016-01-25

不得上訴於第三審法院
Not Appealable to the Court of Third Instance



「不得上訴於第三審法院。」是我自2015年起的口頭禪之一。 "Not appealable to the court of third instance." is one of my pet phrases since 2015.
這句話出自〈最高法院刑事判例69年台上字第2037號〉,它是我第一個接觸到的判例,因此刻骨銘心。 The sentence originated from Supreme Court criminal precedent, 69th year, Tai Shang Zi No. 2037, which was the first precedent that I contacted with and thus impressive to me.
其內涵在於:為了合理分配有限的司法資源,法律規定某幾種輕微案件不得上訴於第三審法院,至多兩審定讞。 It means: for reasonably distributing the finite judicial resources, the laws prescribe that certain kinds of minor cases are not appealable to the court of third instance, and a definitive judgement will be given by no more than two instances.
如此,當事人只剩下兩個審級可以平反,一個審級利益被法定剝奪了。 As a result, the person involved in such cases can argue for his justice in only two instances, and one of his instance benefit is legally deprived.
這顯示出了現實的殘酷。 This shows the cruelty of the reality.

沒有留言: