專業之威信 The Prestige of Profession

專業之認定，依法律；無法律者，依習慣。但政治之運作[1]，無專業可言。	A profession affair shall be certified by laws; if there is no law, by customs. But the works of politics[1] cannot be professional.
質疑專業，應具名並附具理由，始得為之。	A person shall show his name and give a reason when he doubts a professional affair.
前項理由，應包括下列各款之一： 質疑人為該種專業人員者，其意見。 質疑人諮詢該種專業人員者，該專業人員之姓名及意見。 質疑人查詢該種專業文獻者，該專業文獻之資訊及引文或引文標示。	The reason in the preceding paragraph shall include one of the following items: For the doubter being a professional in regard to the affair, his opinion. For the doubter having sought advice from a professional in regard to the affair, the professional's name and opinion. For the doubter having searched a guide from a document in regard to the affair, the document's information, and the quoted passage or the indication of the quoted passage.
質疑違反第二項規定者，視為[2]誣疑；其意見，視為無理由。但擬制之效力，於瑕疵補正時解除之。	A doubt violating the prescription in the second paragraph shall be deemed[2] a false doubt; the opinion in the doubt shall be deemed meritless. But the effects of the deems shall be rescinded when the defects are corrected.
專業受誣疑人介入者，即非專業，其致生損害時，專業人員視為無過失。	A professional affair interfering by a false doubter becomes an unprofessional affair, and when it causes damages, the professional shall be deemed not of negligence.

---

Notes:

[1]	政治之研究，尤有專業可言。	The researches of politics can still be professional.
[2]	視為，不得推翻。	A deem is an irrebuttable presumption.