五育之分割評價 Respective Evaluation for the Five Educations

不同因次之項，固不可共量也，故令德、智、體、群、美五育加總平均，乃當代至愚之創舉！	The terms with different dimensions are incommensurable, of course, so it is the most stupid creation in contemporary society to sum up and average one's points in the five educations, which are moral, intellectual, social, physical, and aesthetic educations.
德不行，而智、體、群、美皆百分之人，其身價得八十分歟？惟長才盡用之於邪謀，豈非恐怖？	For one who got 0 point in moral education but 100 points in each of intellectual, social, physical, and aesthetic educations, shall we give him 80 points as his social status? Think about the case he makes use of all his advantages in evil plans, is it not terrifying?
德百分，而智、體、群、美皆不行之人，其身價得二十分歟？雖無功勞，亦無妨害。	For one who got 100 points in moral education but 0 point in each of intellectual, social, physical, and aesthetic educations, shall we give him 20 points as his social status? Even if he is not contributive, he is not detrimental as well.
德歸德，智歸智、體歸體、群歸群、美歸美，應分割而評價焉。	We shall respectively evaluate one's moral, intellectual, social, physical, and aesthetic educations.