時變觀念 Time-Variant Conception

我們經常有這種盲點，就是覺得：(一)別人不會變；(二)自己不該變。	We often have such blind spots that (a) others will never change; and (b) we shall never change.
結果，那人變很好，我們不肯接納；這人變很壞，我們不肯離棄。那麼我們就吃虧了。	Then, when that person has become very good, we still refuse to accept him; when this person has become very bad, we still refuse to leave him. These kinds of choices are not beneficial to us.
所以我說，觀察過去是不夠的，還要觀察過去到現在的變化率。	So I say that, it is not enough to observe the past only, but we have to observe the changing from the past to the present.
同樣地，策劃未來也是不夠的，還要策劃現在到未來的變化率。	Similarly, it is not enough to plan the future only, but we have to plan the changing from the present to the future.

英雄是一種狀態 Hero is a State

英雄是一種狀態，不是一種身分。	"Hero" is a state, but not an identity.
如果英雄因權力而腐敗，我們當下就可以鄙棄他，不需要懊惱自己的信念前後不一致。	If a hero is corrupted by power, we can abandon him immediately with disdain, and we do not have to worry about any inconsistency in our beliefs.

程序之交換律 Commutative Property of Process

程序，其步驟順序交換而發生同一結果者，合於交換律。	A process is commutative if we can derive the same result after we change the orders of the steps of the process.
不合於交換律之程序，其步驟順序交換而疑似發生同一結果者，蓋隱含另一結果未經察覺。	Where we seems to derive the same result after we change the orders of the steps of a non-commutative process, there is actually another implicit result remaining unobserved.

意識形態與納粹 Ideology and the Nazis

希特勒在1934年第六屆納粹黨大會演說中提到，納粹在最初只有七個成員時，已經有兩個原則：第一、它將是一個純粹意識形態政黨；第二、它將毫不妥協地成為德國的一支且唯一一支力量。	Hitler said, in his speech from the Sixth Nazi Party Congress in 1934 that, when the Nazis consisted only seven members, it already had two principles: first, it would be a party with a true ideology, and second, it would be, uncompromisingly, the one and only power in Germany.
因此，如果我們發現，有誰提出某些訴求，只是純粹意識形態的空想，同時加上毫不妥協的堅持，我們就要當心。	Accordingly, we have to be careful when we notice that someone pursue some rights, which are illusions of true ideology, accompanied with his uncompromising insistence.
換句話說，堅持具體可行的訴求，或妥協於暫時不可行的訴求，屬於安全範圍。	In other words, it is okay to insist a particularly available right, or to compromise on a temporally unavailable right.

選擇性執法 Selective Enforcement

我們選擇性清潔前街，不清潔後街，至少前街清潔了，也是頂好的。前街之清潔並無任何問題，是後街之不清潔才有問題。	In case that we selectively clean the front street but not the back street, it is still good because at least the front street is cleaned. The cleaned front street is not a problem, but the problem is the uncleaned back street.
同理，選擇性執法並無任何問題，而是選擇性不執法才有問題。因此，當選擇性執法發生時，無須指摘已然之執法，而是應該督促遂行未然之執法。	Similarly, the selective enforcement is not a problem, but the problem is the selective non-enforcement. Therefore, when the government did a selective enforcement, we do not have to criticize the enforcement done, but we have to urge the government to do the enforcement expected to be done.
如此，才不會促長大家一起爛的歪風。	After all, we shall not get used to the bad custom of everybody corruption.

邏輯上、物理上與法律上不能 Logical, Physical and Legal Impossibilities

邏輯上不能者，物理上不能。	Logical impossibility implies physical impossibility.
邏輯上不能或物理上不能者，未必法律上不能。	Logical impossibility or physical impossibility do not imply legal impossibility.
但以邏輯上不能或物理上不能為法律上所能者，即為災禍。	However, it will be a disaster when we think a law possibly effective to a thing that is logically impossible or physically impossible.

空想法律 A Fantastic Law

法律並沒有變出現實事物的魔法。	A law does not have a magic of producing a real thing.
利用法律變出權利，卻沒有現實事物可支援該權利，該法律即為空想，應予廢止。	In case of a law prescribed to create a right without a real thing to support it, such a law is just a fantasy and shall be abolished.
然而，製造出空想法律的人，因其無知及無能，通常會進一步再利用法律變出義務，要求別人去實現該空想。這是最令人受不了的。	Typically, because of his/her ignorance and incompetence, the person who prescribed the fantastic law will further prescribe another law to create an obligation that asks other people to realize such a fantasy. This is the most annoying thing.