法律並沒有變出現實事物的魔法。 | A law does not have a magic of producing a real thing. |
利用法律變出權利,卻沒有現實事物可支援該權利,該法律即為空想,應予廢止。 | In case of a law prescribed to create a right without a real thing to support it, such a law is just a fantasy and shall be abolished. |
然而,製造出空想法律的人,因其無知及無能,通常會進一步再利用法律變出義務,要求別人去實現該空想。這是最令人受不了的。 | Typically, because of his/her ignorance and incompetence, the person who prescribed the fantastic law will further prescribe another law to create an obligation that asks other people to realize such a fantasy. This is the most annoying thing. |
Chinese: 吳爾軒的後設猜想
English: Narvis the Cloud's Metahypotheses
Japanese: ナルビスのメタ予想
Latin: Narvis Nubes Metahypotheses
English: Narvis the Cloud's Metahypotheses
Japanese: ナルビスのメタ予想
Latin: Narvis Nubes Metahypotheses
本網站內容之使用,請參閱著作權聲明書。
To use the contents on this website, please read Copyright Statement.
2018-03-27
空想法律
A Fantastic Law
訂閱:
張貼留言 (Atom)
沒有留言:
張貼留言