Chinese: 吳爾軒的後設猜想
English: Narvis the Cloud's Metahypotheses
Japanese: ナルビスのメタ予想
Latin: Narvis Nubes Metahypotheses

本網站內容之使用,請參閱著作權聲明書
To use the contents on this website, please read Copyright Statement.

2016-08-30

後設猜想之不平等
The Inequality of the Metahypotheses



平等函數對於系統所固有之命題始有適用之餘地,故不完備之系統即無所謂平等。 The function of equality is effective only to the theses existed in a system, so the equality is inapplicable in an incomplete system.
後設猜想既立基於系統之不完備,自無許平等恆與其共存。 Founded on the incompleteness of a system, the Metahypotheses forbid the equality always exists therewith.

2016-08-17

形式的寄望
Hope of Formality



從古到今,人們被教導「實質重於形式」,於是,種種形式被打破了,種種實質被揭開了。 Throughout the history, people are taught that "substance is over form", and in this way, several formalities have been broken, and several substances have been discovered.
可是,根據實證,重實質時代的人們比起重形式時代的人們,希望更少,絕望更多。 However, empirically observed, the people in the substance-oriented age, compared to the people in the formality-oriented, are less hopeful, but more hopeless.
形式就好比是禮物的包裝。看到包裝時,會很欣喜;拆開包裝時,會很期待;而拆開包裝後,會很驚奇。翻越形式的重巖疊嶂而獲得成就的感受亦復如是。 A formality is just like a gift wrapping. It is happy when seeing the wrapping, exciting when opening the wrapping, and amazing after opening the wrapping. A similar feeling may occur for an achievement by going over mountains of formalities.
然而,世上懶人與蠢人居多。懶人不願意包裝禮物,而蠢人無能力包裝禮物。在懶人與蠢人的主導下,禮物的包裝漸漸被放棄。同理,基於麻煩與困難,形式漸漸被放棄。 However, there are more lazy people and stupid people in the world. Lazy people is unwilling to wrap a gift, while stupid is incapable to wrap a gift. Playing up to the lazy people and the stupid people, the world tends to give up gift wrappings. Similarly, due to complexity and difficulty, the world tends to give up formalities.
當然,比起關心禮物的包裝,人們更關心禮物的內容。 For sure, people concern more about the gift content than about the gift wrapping.
拆開禮物的包裝後,多半會得到禮物的內容。可是,面對世界,打破形式就會揭開實質嗎?根據實證,答案是否定的。 Mostly, we will get a gift content after opening a gift wrapping. However, for the world, will we discover a substance after breaking a formality? Empirically observed, the answer is negative.
畢竟你有你的實質,我有我的實質,實質缺少了共量性,也就失去了存在的意義。 After all, everyone has his own substance. A substance losses its meaning of existence as it lacks a commensurability among people.
禮物沒有內容,固然令人失望,可是不要忘記,還有包裝啊!既然世界根本沒有實質,唯一的寄望乃是形式。 It is disappointing for a gift without a content, but do not forget that, there is still a wrapping! Since no substance is actually in the world, the hopes are only on formalities.
因此,形式需要重構。 Therefore, formalities need reconstruction.

2016-08-09

建立自信的取樣範圍
Sampling Range for Building up Confidence



如果人總是與世界相比,他不可能自信,如此將可能失去進步的動力。 If a person is always compared with the world, he may not be confident, and in this way, he may lose the power of improvement.
如果人總是與自己相比,他不可能謙卑,如此將可能失去進步的動機。 If a person is always compared with himself, he may not be modest, and in this way, he may lose the motivation of improvement.
故建立自信的取樣範圍應採主觀可及範圍說。 Thus, the sampling range for building up confidence shall be accorded to the theory of subjectively accessible range.
對於自信過低,而不利於自己的人,或自信過高,而不利於他人的人,應協助他建立主觀可及範圍,或縮放或變更既有的主觀可及範圍。 For a person who is hypoconfident to disadvantage himself, or hyperconfident to disadvantage another, we shall help him establishing a subjectively accessible range, or scale or alter the existed subjectively accessible range.
自信雖然過高或過低,但是並沒有造成不利,也就不必調整。 In case of hypoconfidence or hyperconfidence without disadvantage, there is no need for adjustment.