Chinese: 吳爾軒的後設猜想
English: Narvis the Cloud's Metahypotheses
Japanese: ナルビスのメタ予想
Latin: Narvis Nubes Metahypotheses

本網站內容之使用,請參閱著作權聲明書
To use the contents on this website, please read Copyright Statement.

2014-07-27


Buddha



佛之形式上定義如次:
知且恰知佛定義者為佛[1]。
The formal definition of Buddha is as follows:
One is Buddha, if and only if he knows the definition of Buddha.
除因自身湧現強力意志力迫上開強力意志自我衰變,以其衰變之碎片布置因果模態,以護送自身在閔可夫斯基時空中重力歸零外,不可突破哥德爾界限而至少以維特根斯坦視野窺見佛之實質上定義,即無上正等菩提。 Excepted as with certain reasons oneself shows his will to power forcing his will to power itself to decay, arranging a causal mode with the fragments drawn from the decay of his will to power, escorting himself to return to zero gravity in Minkowski's spacetime, one cannot break through Godel's boundary, being at least with Wittgenstein's horizon to have a glimpse of the substantial definition of Buddha, Anuttara-Samyak-Sambodhi.




Notes:

[1] 為佛,即為佛之行。上開定義知佛即為佛,乃知行合一也。 "One is Buddha" means he acts as Buddha. We define knowing Buddha is exactly acting as Buddha, for knowledge and action shall be one.

沒有留言: