不可分之眾主張即為一主張之眾等價表述,而對於凡夫呈現不可分之假象。 | Indivisible claims are actually equivalent expressions of a single claim, and it shows ordinary people to an illusion of indivisibility. |
可分之眾主張,應逐一檢視其邏輯上、物理上與法律上之可行性。 | In the face of divisible claims, we shall check the claims one by one for their logical, physical and legal possibilities. |
未逐一檢視,唯因包裹有一好惡主張而好惡全包裹者,確屬不智。 | It is indeed unwise to favor or disfavor a whole package in virtue only of a single favorable or unfavorable claim, without checking the claims one by one. |
Chinese: 吳爾軒的後設猜想
English: Narvis the Cloud's Metahypotheses
Japanese: ナルビスのメタ予想
Latin: Narvis Nubes Metahypotheses
English: Narvis the Cloud's Metahypotheses
Japanese: ナルビスのメタ予想
Latin: Narvis Nubes Metahypotheses
本網站內容之使用,請參閱著作權聲明書。
To use the contents on this website, please read Copyright Statement.
2019-03-29
包裹式主張
Package of Claims
訂閱:
文章 (Atom)